GLP-2
Also known as: glucagon-like peptide-2, GLP-2, proglucagon (126-158)
The reference molecule for the intestinotrophic peptide class — a 33-residue proglucagon fragment whose seven-minute plasma half-life is precisely the design problem teduglutide and apraglutide were engineered to solve.
- Primary sources
- 0
- Mechanism dossiers
- 4
- Documented cycles
- 0
- Last reviewed
- 2026-05-18
3 decision
Across all tiers
GLP-2 is the 33-amino-acid peptide hormone — HADGSFSDEMNTILDNLAARDFINWLIQTKITD — cleaved from the proglucagon precursor by prohormone convertases in intestinal L-cells of the distal small intestine and colon. The molecule's identity as a discrete intestinal proglucagon-derived peptide was established by Buhl T, Thim L, Kofod H et al., J Biol Chem 1988, 263:8621–8624, which isolated and sequenced proglucagon(126-158) from porcine ileal mucosa, building on the tissue-specific proglucagon processing characterized in the landmark Mojsov S, Heinrich G, Wilson IB et al., J Biol Chem 1986, 261:11880–11889 — the report that established why the same gene yields glucagon in pancreatic α-cells and GLP-1 / GLP-2 in intestinal L-cells.
The intestinotrophic identity was established by Drucker DJ, Erlich P, Asa SL, Brubaker PL, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:7911–7916, which documented marked increases in bowel weight and jejunal and ileal villus height in mice within four days of GLP-2 administration, alongside crypt cell proliferation by BrdU incorporation. The receptor was cloned three years later in Munroe DG, Gupta AK, Kooshesh F et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999, 96:1569–1573 — a class B G-protein-coupled receptor (GLP2R) signaling through Gαs to adenylate cyclase and the cAMP / protein kinase A cascade, most closely related to the glucagon and GLP-1 receptors. The receptor is expressed on intestinal subepithelial myofibroblasts, enteric neurons, and a subset of enteroendocrine cells, but notably not on the intestinal epithelial cells whose proliferation it ultimately drives — GLP-2's effect on crypt cells propagates indirectly through paracrine intermediaries including IGF-1, keratinocyte growth factor, and ErbB-family ligands released by myofibroblasts and neuronal populations in response to receptor engagement. The unusual cell-type architecture is reviewed in Drucker DJ, Yusta B, ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci 2019, 2:468–484.
The downstream phenotype is the intestinotrophic signature: crypt cell proliferation, increased villus height, reduced enterocyte apoptosis, slowed gastric emptying, increased mesenteric blood flow, and reduced intestinal permeability. The pharmacology is mechanistically distinct from the GLP-1 receptor agonist class anchored by semaglutide, tirzepatide, and liraglutide — GLP-2 is not an incretin, does not act on pancreatic β-cells, and does not produce the central-vagal appetite signal that drives the GLP-1-class weight-loss phenotype. Both peptides are tandemly encoded on the same precursor, but the receptor systems diverge sharply. The pancreatic glucagon hormone shares only the proglucagon backbone; its receptor pharmacology is non-overlapping with GLP-2's.
The pharmacokinetic ceiling on native GLP-2's therapeutic use is rapid degradation by dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV). Cleavage at the Ala2-Asp3 bond yields GLP-2(3-33), a largely inactive fragment lacking the intestinotrophic potency of the intact peptide. The kinetics were quantified in humans by Hartmann B, Harr MB, Jeppesen PB et al., J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000, 85:2884–2888, which reported an intravenous elimination half-life of 7.2 ± 2.0 minutes for intact GLP-2, abolishable by a DPP-IV inhibitor in vitro — the empirical foundation for the conclusion that chronic GLP-2 pharmacology would require a DPP-IV-resistant analog. That conclusion drove the development of teduglutide (Ala2-to-Gly2 substitution, ~2-hour half-life) and apraglutide (additional non-natural substitutions plus engineered protein binding, ~30–50-hour half-life, once-weekly subcutaneous dosing).
Native GLP-2 is the reference molecule for the intestinotrophic peptide class — the parent hormone whose pharmacology defined what the engineered analogs were built to do, but which is itself not a clinical product. The molecule appears on this site for the same reason native glucagon does: it is the foundational biology against which the clinical-grade analogs are read, and the comparative context the GLP-1 receptor pharmacology dossier and the peptide receptor pharmacology atlas draw on when characterizing the proglucagon-derived peptide family.
The discovery arc traces from the 1986 Mojsov characterization of tissue-specific proglucagon processing, through the 1988 Buhl identification of proglucagon(126-158), to the 1996 Drucker demonstration of the intestinotrophic phenotype, and the 1999 Munroe receptor cloning that closed the molecular loop. The subsequent decade of receptor-localization and signaling work is consolidated in Drucker DJ, Gastroenterology 2002, 122:531–544 and the Drucker/Yusta 2019 ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci review.
The clinical translation problem was the seven-minute plasma half-life. The Hartmann 2000 demonstration of DPP-IV cleavage at Ala2-Asp3 made native GLP-2 unsuitable for any chronic dosing schedule outside continuous intravenous infusion. The molecule has been studied as a continuous infusion in healthy volunteers and SBS patients — the early Jeppesen short-bowel-syndrome work that anchored the eventual STEPS trial used native GLP-2 by continuous subcutaneous infusion before the teduglutide program existed — but no native-GLP-2 product has ever been marketed for any indication in any jurisdiction. The therapeutic pathway the field actually delivered runs through the engineered analogs: teduglutide (FDA-approved 2012 for adult SBS-IF, pediatric extension 2019) and apraglutide (Phase III STARS primary endpoint met in 2024, FDA confirmatory trial requested in 2025).
The mechanism-versus-residence-time distinction is the central pharmacological point. Receptor engagement, downstream cell-proliferation signaling, the villus-height response, and the reduction in intestinal permeability are all native GLP-2 biology. The two-hour (teduglutide) or thirty-to-fifty-hour (apraglutide) plasma residence is engineered overlay. Practitioner discussion that uses "GLP-2" interchangeably for native peptide and analog frequently conflates these two layers; this page is the reference for the underlying biology, with the analog pages carrying clinical-development detail.
A second framing worth setting explicitly: GLP-2 and GLP-1 are tandemly encoded on the proglucagon precursor and are processed in parallel from the same L-cells, but the receptor systems diverge sharply. GLP-1 is the incretin that drives glucose-dependent insulin secretion and the central-vagal appetite signal; GLP-2 is the intestinotrophic hormone that drives crypt-cell proliferation and mucosal growth. The parallel naming reinforces the assumption that they are pharmacological siblings — they are not. The IBD and peptides dossier develops the contrast in greater detail.
Goal-oriented comparisons and mechanism deep-dives that cover GLP-2. Decision guides compare the realistic options for a goal (peptide / drug / lifestyle); mechanism dossiers walk the pathway in depth.
Decision guides all guides →
Starting point
Peptide allergens and excipients reference
Read
Starting point
Peptide bioavailability comparison reference
Read
Starting point
Peptide cold-chain logistics and travel reference
Read
Mechanism dossiers
Native GLP-2 is not a marketed product and is not used in chronic clinical dosing schedules, so the safety profile is characterized primarily through short-duration human pharmacology studies and through the longer-duration analog safety literature. The pharmacology-derived concerns track the analog labels, and the dominant consideration is neoplasia: GLP-2-driven crypt cell proliferation is the mechanism that underlies the intestinotrophic response and is the basis for teduglutide's label-mandated polyp-surveillance protocol (baseline colonoscopy within six months prior to initiation, follow-up colonoscopy and upper GI endoscopy at year one, and subsequent endoscopic surveillance every five years or more often as clinically indicated). Any research-context exposure to native GLP-2 or the analogs carries the same mechanism-derived concern.
Second-order considerations include fluid overload (intestinal fluid absorption increases with GLP-2 pharmacology, which can compound a fixed parenteral fluid prescription in SBS contexts), pancreatic and biliary disease signals seen with the analog programs, intestinal obstruction risk in the context of pre-existing mechanical narrowing, and injection-site reactions with subcutaneous administration. The molecule has not been characterized in pregnancy or lactation; the pediatric data are exclusive to the teduglutide pediatric STEPS program (down to age 1 in the FDA label).
The off-label use case where biohacker conversation occasionally surfaces native GLP-2 — typically through research-chemical channels marketing the parent peptide as a less expensive alternative to compounded teduglutide — carries a structural pharmacokinetic limitation that practitioner discussion rarely makes explicit. The seven-minute plasma half-life means any subcutaneous schedule producing chronic biological effect requires either multiple-times-daily injection at impractical frequency, co-administration of a DPP-IV inhibitor, or implicit acceptance that the dose produces transient receptor engagement rather than the sustained intestinotrophic exposure the analog molecules deliver. The mechanism is identical to the analogs; the residence-time-mediated dose-response is not.
Contraindications
- Active gastrointestinal malignancy (GI tract, hepatobiliary, pancreatic) — mechanism-derived precaution by analogy to the teduglutide label, given the shared proliferative pharmacology
- Active non-gastrointestinal malignancy — caution warranted under any chronic exposure; the analog labels require individual benefit-risk assessment
- Known hypersensitivity to GLP-2 or to research-grade synthesis impurities
- Pregnancy and breastfeeding (no human data; not recommended)
- Active pancreatitis or biliary obstruction
- Mechanical intestinal obstruction
- Absence of any approved clinical indication — native GLP-2 use outside characterized research protocols does not have a coherent regulatory or evidentiary pathway
More like this in your inbox.
The free 6-page PDF — Top 10 Peptides Worth Knowing — covers the evidence and the boundaries on the peptides every curious biohacker eventually encounters.
One unsubscribe click ends it forever. The address is never sold and never shared with vendors.
07·Member discussion
No member discussion yet.
Member-only conversation lives here — cycle notes, practitioner commentary, pattern-matching. Be the first paying member to start the thread.