Retatrutide
Also known as: LY3437943
Retatrutide is the first triple-receptor agonist (GLP-1, GIP, glucagon) to reach Phase II in obesity — at the highest dose, mean weight loss reached 24.2% at 48 weeks, the largest published pharmacotherapy result to date.
- Routes
- Subcutaneous
- Half-life
- Approximately 6 days plasma half-life on weekly subcutaneous dosing; the molecule is engineered for albumin-binding stability comparable to semaglutide and tirzepatide.
- Legal status
- Prescription only
Retatrutide is a synthetic peptide engineered as a balanced agonist of three receptors: the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor, the glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor, and the glucagon receptor ([Jastreboff et al., *N Engl J Med* 2023, 389:514–526](https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2301972)). The first two receptors share their incretin mechanism with tirzepatide and semaglutide, respectively; the addition of glucagon-receptor agonism is what distinguishes retatrutide and is hypothesized to add a pro-energy-expenditure component to the appetite-suppressive and insulin-sensitizing effects of the two incretins. Mechanistically, glucagon-receptor agonism increases hepatic glucose output, mobilizes lipids, and raises basal energy expenditure — a combination that, balanced correctly against the incretin signals, is intended to drive weight loss through both reduced energy intake and increased energy turnover. The fatty-acid modification for albumin binding produces a roughly week-long pharmacokinetic profile suited to weekly dosing.
Retatrutide is the metabolic peptide where pharmacology is most actively expanding. The published Phase 2 trial (Jastreboff et al., *NEJM* 2023) randomized 338 adults with obesity to weekly retatrutide (1, 4, 8, or 12 mg) or placebo for 48 weeks. Mean weight change at 48 weeks was -8.7%, -17.1%, -22.8%, and -24.2% on the four doses versus -2.1% on placebo. At the 12-mg dose, every participant achieved at least 5% weight loss, 93% achieved at least 10%, and 83% achieved at least 15% — exceeding the response-rate envelope set by the SURMOUNT-1 tirzepatide trial. Cardiometabolic improvements followed the weight loss; 72% of participants who had prediabetes at baseline reverted to normoglycemia. Heart-rate increases peaked at 24 weeks and then declined toward baseline. Adverse events were dominated by transient mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal symptoms during dose escalation, consistent with the GLP-1 / GIP–GLP-1 class. The honest framing has two parts. First, the headline Phase 2 numbers are the most striking obesity-pharmacotherapy results published to date. Phase III trials (SURMOUNT-OB, TRIUMPH program in T2D and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease) are ongoing or being analyzed; preliminary disclosures continue to support the Phase 2 efficacy signal. Second, retatrutide remains an investigational agent. Off-label or compounded retatrutide that exists in the practitioner market today is sourced outside the regulatory approval pathway, with all of the sourcing-quality concerns the site declines to relitigate but that readers should weight heavily. The credibility of the Phase 2 trial does not transfer to a compounded supply. The longer-horizon safety questions are also less mature than for semaglutide or tirzepatide. The glucagon-receptor agonism component is genuinely new in human chronic dosing, and the long-tail signals that decades of GLP-1-class use have ruled in or out (or not) — pancreatitis incidence patterns, NAION, gastroparesis, suicidal ideation — are still being built for retatrutide.
Each entry below is graded on the four-tier evidence scale (peer-primary → practitioner) and carries an independent strength label that captures how robustly the source supports the claim it backs on this page.
- Tier 1 · Peer primarystrongTriple-Hormone-Receptor Agonist Retatrutide for Obesity — A Phase 2 Trial
Jastreboff AM, Kaplan LM, Frías JP, et al. · 2023 · New England Journal of Medicine
More like this in your inbox.
The free 6-page PDF — Top 10 Peptides Worth Knowing — covers the evidence and the boundaries on the peptides every curious biohacker eventually encounters.
One unsubscribe click ends it forever. The address is never sold and never shared with vendors.
Reported adverse events in the published Phase 2 trial were dominated by transient GI symptoms, mostly mild to moderate, concentrated during dose escalation — the same character as the GLP-1 / GIP–GLP-1 class. Heart-rate increase was noted, peaking at week 24 and declining thereafter. Discontinuation due to adverse events was higher than placebo across active arms but within the range typical for the class. The class warnings that apply to GLP-1 agonists (medullary thyroid carcinoma boxed warning based on rodent data, pancreatitis, gallbladder disease, hypoglycemia in combination with insulin or sulfonylureas) apply by extension. The glucagon-receptor activity introduces a class-distinct consideration: hepatic glucose output and lipid mobilization, which are part of the intended mechanism but also imply that glycemic and hepatic-function monitoring matters more than for pure incretin agonists.
Contraindications
- Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 syndrome (boxed warning carried over from the class) - Pregnancy or breastfeeding (no adequate human safety data) - History of severe or recurrent pancreatitis - Active or recent eating disorder (appetite-suppressive mechanism contraindicated) - Significant hepatic disease without specialist oversight (glucagon-receptor agonism increases hepatic glucose output) - Severe gastroparesis or other significant GI motility disease - Concurrent insulin or sulfonylurea therapy without endocrinologist oversight - Concurrent use of other GLP-1, GIP, or dual/triple-incretin agonists (cumulative GI burden, no clinical rationale) - Patients under 18 (no controlled data; Phase III adult trials still maturing)