Increased expression of the mitochondrial derived peptide, MOTS-c, in skeletal muscle of healthy aging men is associated with myofiber composition
D'Souza RF, Woodhead JST, Hedges CP, Zeng N, Wan J, Kumagai H, Lee C, Cohen P, +3 more
Aging (2020) · n=104
Across 104 healthy men in three age strata, plasma MOTS-c declined 21% from young to elderly cohorts — but skeletal-muscle MOTS-c expression rose 1.5-fold with age and tracked slow-fibre composition, suggesting two distinct tissue-specific regulatory patterns rather than a single age-decline curve.
This 2020 Aging paper from a New Zealand–USC collaboration (the Cameron-Smith and Cohen groups) is the most rigorous published human-cohort characterisation of MOTS-c across age strata in skeletal muscle and plasma simultaneously. The investigators enrolled 104 healthy men in three age groups — young (18–30 years), middle-aged (45–55 years), and older (70–81 years) — and measured circulating plasma MOTS-c, skeletal-muscle MOTS-c expression (vastus lateralis biopsies), and a panel of muscle-quality and fibre-composition markers. Plasma MOTS-c showed the expected age-decline pattern — middle-aged and older cohorts had 11% and 21% lower circulating MOTS-c respectively than the young group, consistent with the Lee 2015 framing of declining mitochondrial-peptide signalling with age. Strikingly, skeletal-muscle MOTS-c expression moved in the opposite direction — older and middle-aged men had approximately 1.5-fold higher muscle MOTS-c expression than young men. The muscle-tissue MOTS-c correlated with slow-fibre composition (consistent with the age-associated fast-to-slow fibre-type shift) and, in the older group, with muscle quality measured as leg-press strength normalised to thigh cross-sectional area. The paper demonstrates that the simple "MOTS-c declines with age" framing is incomplete and that tissue-specific regulation is more complex than the plasma pattern alone would suggest.
This is a cross-sectional comparative analysis, not a longitudinal study or an interventional trial — the age-group differences observed are confounded by cohort effects (lifetime activity history, dietary patterns, comorbidity profiles) that cross-sectional analysis cannot fully separate. The 104-participant sample is reasonable for an exploratory analysis but small for the multiple subgroup correlations the paper reports. The male-only cohort excludes sex-difference questions that have not been resolved elsewhere in the MOTS-c literature. The muscle-MOTS-c-increases-with-age finding is biologically interesting but mechanistically unresolved — it may reflect adaptive upregulation in response to age-related mitochondrial dysfunction, fibre-type-distribution shifts, or both. The paper does not test exogenous MOTS-c administration; it characterises endogenous levels. As with the rest of the human MOTS-c literature, the leap from "endogenous MOTS-c tracks with X" to "exogenous MOTS-c could improve X" is not made on direct evidence.
07·Member discussion
No member discussion yet.
Member-only conversation lives here — cycle notes, practitioner commentary, pattern-matching. Be the first paying member to start the thread.