Mazdutide
Also known as: LY3305677, IBI-362, IBI362, OXM-3, Xinermei
Mazdutide is the first dual GLP-1 / glucagon receptor agonist approved for chronic weight management in any major jurisdiction — and that jurisdiction is China. In GLORY-1 (n=610), the 6 mg dose produced 14.8% weight loss at week 48 versus 0.5% on placebo, with 50.6% of participants reaching ≥15% loss.
- Primary sources
- 1
- Mechanism dossiers
- 10
- Documented cycles
- 0
- Last reviewed
- 2026-05-18
1 tier 1
9 decision
Across all tiers
Mazdutide is an engineered analog of mammalian oxyntomodulin — the gut-derived 37-amino-acid peptide that activates both the GLP-1 and glucagon receptors as part of the native post-prandial endocrine response. The molecule is built on the oxyntomodulin scaffold with targeted amino-acid substitutions and a fatty-acid side chain conjugated to a lysine residue for albumin binding, producing a once-weekly pharmacokinetic profile. The published in vitro receptor pharmacology reports Ki values of approximately 17.7 nM at the human glucagon receptor and 28.6 nM at the human GLP-1 receptor, giving the molecule a modest glucagon-receptor preference rather than the balanced affinity of survodutide or the more strongly GLP-1-biased agonists. The downstream pharmacology is the dual-agonist signature: GLP-1-receptor activation drives glucose-dependent insulin secretion, slowed gastric emptying, and central appetite suppression; glucagon-receptor activation raises basal energy expenditure, mobilizes hepatic lipid stores, and increases hepatic glucose output. The therapeutic premise of the class is that the appetite-suppressive and insulinotropic GLP-1 effects offset the hyperglycemic potential of glucagon-receptor agonism while the energy-expenditure and hepatic-lipid components add net weight-loss and metabolic benefit beyond what GLP-1 monoagonism can produce.
The structural and pharmacological detail is summarized in the Drugs first-approval review (Shirley, Drugs 2025, 85(12):1621–1627). Mazdutide's place in the class lies between survodutide (a more GLP-1-biased dual agonist in BI / Zealand's SYNCHRONIZE Phase 3 program) and retatrutide (Lilly's GLP-1 / GIP / glucagon triple agonist in TRIUMPH); the investigational peptide pipeline tracker places the three programs side by side.
Mazdutide is the editorial inflection point for the China regulatory pathway in metabolic peptide therapeutics. On June 27, 2025, China's National Medical Products Administration approved mazdutide for chronic weight management in adults under the brand name Xinermei (信瑞利), making it the first dual GCG/GLP-1 receptor agonist approved for weight management in any major jurisdiction. On September 19, 2025, the NMPA approved a second indication for glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes. Neither indication has an active Western regulatory submission as of mid-2026, and Eli Lilly — which licensed Chinese rights to Innovent Biologics in 2019 while retaining ex-China rights — has positioned retatrutide rather than mazdutide as its flagship next-generation global candidate. The result is a regulatory configuration unusual in pharmacology: a chronically-dosed metabolic peptide with two Phase 3 indications approved in China and no near-term path to FDA or EMA review.
The Phase 3 obesity readout is GLORY-1, published in NEJM in May 2025 (Ji et al. 2025). The trial randomized 610 Chinese adults with BMI ≥28 kg/m² (or ≥24 kg/m² with at least one obesity-related comorbidity) to once-weekly mazdutide 4 mg, 6 mg, or placebo for 48 weeks. Mean weight change was −12.05% on 4 mg, −14.84% on 6 mg, and −0.47% on placebo. The proportion of participants reaching ≥5% weight reduction was 73.5%, 82.8%, and 11.5% across the three arms; ≥10% loss was reached by 55.2%, 67.9%, and 2.9%; ≥15% loss by 37.0%, 50.6%, and 2.1%. Among participants with baseline liver fat ≥10% — a substantial fraction of the enrolled population given the East Asian visceral-fat phenotype — relative liver fat reduction at week 48 reached −65.85% on 4 mg and −80.24% on 6 mg versus −5.27% on placebo. The hepatic-fat magnitude is the strongest signal in the program and one of the strongest in any incretin-class trial published to date, comparable to the retatrutide Phase 2a MASLD result. The adverse-event profile was the expected GI signature, dominated by nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting concentrated during dose escalation and mostly mild-to-moderate.
The higher-dose Phase 3 (GLORY-2) tested mazdutide 9 mg over 60 weeks in Chinese adults with BMI ≥30 kg/m² and reported topline results in October 2025: mean weight reduction of 20.08% in the non-diabetic subgroup versus 2.81% on placebo, with 48.7% of mazdutide participants achieving ≥20% loss compared with 3.1% on placebo (Innovent GLORY-2 topline release, October 2025). Innovent submitted the 9 mg supplementary application to the NMPA shortly after readout. The Phase 3 type 2 diabetes program — DREAMS-1 (mazdutide monotherapy versus placebo, n=320) and DREAMS-2 (mazdutide versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg, n=731) — read out in 2024–2025 with both trials meeting their HbA1c primaries and supporting the September 2025 NMPA approval for the T2D indication. DREAMS-1 was published back-to-back with the placebo-controlled Phase 3 in Nature in late 2025 (Zhu et al., Nature 2026, 652(8108):174–180).
The supporting evidence base is robust at the Phase 1b / Phase 2 layer. The Phase 1b multiple-ascending-dose trial of mazdutide 9 mg and 10 mg in Chinese adults with overweight or obesity was published in eClinicalMedicine (Ji et al., eClinicalMedicine 2022, 54:101691) and established the higher-dose tolerability profile. The Phase 2 obesity trial randomized 248 adults to 3 mg, 4.5 mg, 6 mg, or placebo for 24 weeks and reported placebo-adjusted body-weight reductions ranging from −7.7% to −12.3% across active arms (Ji et al., Nat Commun 2023, 14:8289). The Phase 2 T2D trial randomized 250 adults across mazdutide 3 / 4.5 / 6 mg, open-label dulaglutide 1.5 mg, and placebo for 20 weeks and reported HbA1c reductions of −1.41% to −1.67% on mazdutide versus −1.35% on dulaglutide (Chen et al., Diabetes Care 2024, 47(1):160–168). The Phase 2 → Phase 3 translation has been more consistent for mazdutide than for several other dual-agonist programs.
Three honest framings shape how the molecule should be read on this site. The first is the China-pathway question. The NMPA route is shorter than FDA review for the incretin class, and the Phase 3 evidence base supporting mazdutide is entirely Chinese — every trial in the GLORY and DREAMS programs enrolled Chinese participants at Chinese sites. East Asian populations have higher BMI-adjusted visceral-fat distribution and develop type 2 diabetes at lower BMI than Western populations, which is part of the rationale for studying the molecule in this population but also means the cross-population generalizability of the GLORY-1 and DREAMS readouts is genuinely uncertain. Whether the 14.8% weight-loss magnitude at the 6 mg dose, the 20.1% magnitude at the 9 mg dose, and the 80% relative liver-fat reduction translate quantitatively to non-East-Asian populations is an open empirical question. Lilly's decision to prioritize retatrutide over mazdutide for global development means this question is unlikely to be answered by a registrational Phase 3 in the foreseeable future.
The second is the dual-agonist class positioning. Mazdutide, survodutide, and pemvidutide are the three GLP-1 / glucagon dual agonists with active Phase 3 programs. Their receptor-affinity profiles differ — mazdutide leans modestly toward glucagon-receptor preference, survodutide is comparatively more GLP-1-biased, and pemvidutide sits between them. The clinical consequences of those affinity differences are not yet resolved at the head-to-head level; no published trial has compared any two of these molecules directly. The hepatic-fat signal from GLORY-1 invites the hypothesis that the glucagon-receptor component is doing meaningful work in liver-lipid reduction, but the hepatic fat decision guide is the place to read the comparative MASH pharmacology question carefully — the cross-trial design and population differences mean magnitude comparison should be hedged.
The third is the access landscape. Mazdutide is dispensed through licensed Chinese pharmacies as Xinermei; it is not available through any FDA-approved pathway in the United States, EU, or other Western jurisdictions. A gray-market access pattern has emerged consisting of direct-to-consumer importation from Chinese manufacturers and compounded products labeled "mazdutide" sourced through research-chemical channels. The site declines to grade specific suppliers or recommend access pathways; the relevant editorial observation is that mazdutide is a structurally complex 4,563-Da peptide with fatty-acid conjugation chemistry comparable in difficulty to semaglutide and tirzepatide, so the meaningful-purity supply question for compounded or gray-market product applies with the same force as for the rest of the class. The credibility of the GLORY and DREAMS trial results does not transfer to non-Innovent-manufactured supply.
Each entry below is graded on the four-tier evidence scale (peer-primary → practitioner) and carries an independent strength label that captures how robustly the source supports the claim it backs on this page.
- Tier 1 · Peer primarystrongOnce-Weekly Mazdutide in Chinese Adults with Obesity or Overweight
Ji L, Jiang H, Bi Y, et al. · 2025 · New England Journal of Medicine
Goal-oriented comparisons and mechanism deep-dives that cover Mazdutide. Decision guides compare the realistic options for a goal (peptide / drug / lifestyle); mechanism dossiers walk the pathway in depth.
Decision guides all guides →
Starting point
Compounding pharmacy regulatory landscape
Read
Starting point
DEA scheduling and criminal-law peptide landscape
Read
Starting point
Peptide allergens and excipients reference
Read
Starting point
Peptide bioavailability comparison reference
Read
Starting point
Peptide cold-chain logistics and travel reference
Read
Starting point
Peptide dosing in hepatic impairment: a reference
Read
Starting point
Peptide drug-drug interactions reference
Read
Starting point
Peptide injection technique: a technical reference
Read
Starting point
Peptide manufacturing technical reference
Read
Mechanism dossiers
The adverse-event profile across the Phase 2 and Phase 3 programs is dominated by gastrointestinal effects concentrated during dose escalation — nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, decreased appetite — mostly mild-to-moderate and largely transient, consistent with the GLP-1-class signature. In GLORY-1, the most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting at higher rates than placebo; the trial reported no signals of increased cardiovascular risk through 48 weeks. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were within the range typical of the incretin class. The glucagon-receptor agonism component is a class-distinct consideration that travels with mazdutide and the rest of the dual-agonist family: hepatic glucose output and lipid mobilization are part of the intended mechanism but also imply that glycemic monitoring (particularly in combination with insulin or sulfonylureas) and hepatic-function monitoring matter more than for pure incretin agonists. The long-tail safety questions that decades-of-use data have built for semaglutide and tirzepatide — pancreatitis incidence, gallbladder disease, NAION, the suicidal-ideation review, the rodent medullary thyroid carcinoma signal — are class-level considerations that apply by mechanism to mazdutide, but mazdutide-specific characterization of these rare-event profiles is still maturing. Heart-rate increases comparable in magnitude to other incretin-class agents have been reported. The post-marketing surveillance window in China opened in mid-2025 and is the load-bearing data source for long-tail safety that will mature over the next several years.
Contraindications
- Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 syndrome (class-level boxed-warning consideration carried over from the GLP-1 receptor agonist family)
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding (no adequate human safety data)
- History of severe or recurrent pancreatitis (class caution)
- Active or recent eating disorder (the appetite-suppressive mechanism is directly contraindicated)
- Significant hepatic disease without specialist oversight (the glucagon-receptor agonism component increases hepatic glucose output and mobilizes hepatic lipid)
- Severe gastroparesis or other significant GI motility disease (the gastric-emptying-slowing mechanism is contraindicated and exacerbates underlying motility pathology)
- Concurrent insulin or sulfonylurea therapy without endocrinologist oversight (hypoglycemia risk)
- Concurrent use of other GLP-1, GIP, or dual / triple-incretin agonists (no clinical rationale, additive GI burden, no controlled-data envelope)
- Patients under 18 (no controlled adult-trial population beyond the Chinese registrational enrollment; pediatric Phase 1b data have been reported but pediatric prescribing is not within the approved label)
More like this in your inbox.
The free 6-page PDF — Top 10 Peptides Worth Knowing — covers the evidence and the boundaries on the peptides every curious biohacker eventually encounters.
One unsubscribe click ends it forever. The address is never sold and never shared with vendors.
07·Member discussion
No member discussion yet.
Member-only conversation lives here — cycle notes, practitioner commentary, pattern-matching. Be the first paying member to start the thread.